Q&A: “What are your thoughts on the ‘ace discourse’?”
anonymous said:
Hi! I really like your blog, and I’ve seen a few of your videos, you’re really cool and you helped me a lot on understanding my identity. I wanted to ask you, but of course you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to, what are your thoughts on the ‘ace discourse’?
hello and thanks for the kind words. đ
iâm going to be a bit pedantic and ask what exactly youâre referring to when you say âthe ace discourseâ because i feel like this phrase is being used to refer to a lot of different (although related) stuff thatâs been going on on Tumblr for a while now.
do you mean how some people insist that inclusion in âthe LGBT communityâ is based on oppression? that aces arenât oppressed at all? that aces are oppressed, but not for being ace?
do you mean how some people insist that cisgender heteroromantic aces donât belong in âthe LGBT communityâ? that heteroromantic ace pride is like (heteroromantic) heterosexual pride? that âcishet acesâ shouldnât identify as queer?
do you mean how some people insist that the word âallosexualâ is problematic because asexuals arenât oppressed by allosexuals? that âallosexualâ is racist, sexualizes LGB people, groups them with their oppressors, etc?
do you mean how some people insist that aces are âstealingâ LGBT resources? that aces are wrong for wanting sex education that is ace inclusive?
do you mean how some people insist that the split attraction model in and of itself is homophobic? that it automatically sexualizes LGB people? that it does more damage than good?
itâs all bullshit that i generally prefer not to involve myself in, honestly. đ
some links may contain triggering content, but all of them are ace positive and there should be no need to worry about running into unchallenged antiasexuality.
One Comment
Pingback: