[A]sexuality,  Q&A,  Queer[ness]

Q&A: “I was just trying to see if the definition of lithromantic can be bent according to who experiences it.”

anonymous said:

Hi! I was just trying to see if the definition of lithromantic can be bent according to who experiences it. Basically, the definition i experience is the one where once my feelings are reciprocated, that romantic attraction fades away. It doesnt have to necessarily mean that i get uncomfortable with having my feelings reciprocated, does it? Like, i dont necessarily mind if my partner says all these lovey dovey stuff, but most of the time i dont exactly say it back. Sorry im confused ㅠㅠ

hi, anon. 🙂

being lithromantic does not mean that one automatically finds reciprocated romantic attraction repulsive upon ones own attraction fading, nor does it imply that one feels any particular way about having one’s romantic attraction reciprocated. being lithromantic means that once romantic attraction is reciprocated, the attraction that you feel fades. that’s all. what happens after that differs from person to person.

any definition that implies that all lithromantic people as romance repulsed, ignoring the diversity that exists among lithromantic people, is one that i personally have issue with.

YouTuber and Blogger, Vesper is an American expat currently living in Japan.

Leave a comment?